Jesús Rubio

We present a comprehensive and pedagogical formulation of Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation, providing explicit conditions for achieving minimum quadratic losses. Within this framework, we analyse the role of measurement incompatibility and establish its quantitative effect on attainable precision. We achieve this by deriving upper bounds based on the pretty good measurement—a notion originally developed for hypothesis testing—combined with the evaluation of the Nagaoka–Hayashi lower bound. In general, we prove that, as in the many-copy regime of local estimation theory, incompatibility can at most double the minimum loss relative to the idealised scenario in which individually optimal measurements are assumed jointly implementable. This result implies that, in many practical situations, the latter may provide a sufficient and computationally efficient benchmark without solving the full optimisation problem. Our results, which we illustrate through a range of applications, including discrete quantum phase imaging, phase and dephasing estimation, and qubit sensing, provide analytical and numerical tools for assessing ultimate precision limits and the role of measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum metrology. We also provide an open-source package that implements all bounds discussed here, enabling practical evaluation and comparison across quantum metrological models.

Global sensing enables parameter estimation across arbitrary parameter ranges with a finite number of shots. While various formulations exist, the Bayesian paradigm offers a flexible approach to optimal protocol design under minimal assumptions. However, there are several sets of assumptions capturing the notions of prior ignorance and uninformed estimation, leading to two main approaches: invariance of the prior distribution under specific parameter transformations, and adherence to the geometry of a state space. While the first approach often leads to simpler priors and estimators and is more broadly applicable in adaptive settings, the second can lead to faster posterior convergence in a well-defined measurement setting. We examine the practical consequences of both approaches and show how to apply them in examples of rate and coherence estimation in noisy scenarios. More importantly, by employing the notion of location-isomorphic parameters, we unify the two approaches into a practical and versatile framework for optimal global quantum sensing, detailing when and how each set of assumptions should be employed—a blueprint for the design of quantum sensors.

Bayesian methods promise enhanced device performance and accelerated data collection. We demonstrate an adaptive Bayesian measurement strategy for atom number estimation in a quantum technology experiment, utilising a symmetry-informed loss function. Compared to a standard unoptimised strategy, our method yields a five-fold reduction in the fractional variance of the atom number estimate. Equivalently, it achieves the target precision with 40% fewer data points. We provide general expressions for the optimal estimator and error for any quantity amenable to symmetry-informed strategies, facilitating the application of these strategies in quantum computing, communication, metrology, and the wider quantum technology sector.

PhD thesis, University of Sussex (2020) The number of times that we can access a system to extract information via quantum metrology is always finite, and possibly small, and realistic amounts of prior knowledge tend to be moderate. Thus theoretical consistency demands a methodology that departs from asymptotic approximations and restricted parameter locations, while practical convenience requires that it is also flexible and easy to use in applications with limited data. We submit that this methodology can and should be built on a Bayesian framework, and in this thesis we propose, construct, explore and exploit a new non-asymptotic quantum metrology. First we show the consistency of taking those solutions that are optimal in the asymptotic regime of many trials as a guide to calculate a Bayesian measure of uncertainty. This provides an approximate but useful way of studying the non-asymptotic regime whenever an exact optimisation is intractable, and it avoids the non-physical results that can arise when only the asymptotic theory is used. Secondly, we construct a new non-asymptotic Bayesian bound without relying on the previous approximation by first selecting a single-shot optimal quantum strategy, and then simulating a sequence of repetitions of this scheme. These methods are then applied to a single-parameter Mach-Zehnder interferometer, and to multi-parameter qubit and optical sensing networks. Our results provide a detailed characterisation of how the interplay between prior information, correlations and a limited amount of data affects the performance of quantum metrology protocols, which opens the door to a vast set of unexplored possibilities to enhance non-asymptotic schemes. Finally, we provide practical researchers with a numerical toolbox for Bayesian metrology, while theoretical workers will benefit from the broader and more fundamental perspective that arises from the unified character of our methodology.