Logo image
Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017–2025: An update) – endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017–2025: An update) – endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN)

Roi Cohen Kadosh, Andrea Antal, Jovana Bjekić, Ana Ganho-Ávila, Ivan Alekseichuk, Sara Assecondi, Til Ole Bergmann, Marom Bikson, Jerome Brunelin, Andre R Brunoni, …
Clinical neurophysiology, Vol.184, pp.2111436-2111436
23/11/2025
PMID: 41622107

Abstract

Adverse events tACS tDCS tES Training Ethics Regulation Safety
•No serious adverse events casually linked to tES; only mild, transient effects reported.•Safety is consistent across healthy, clinical, and vulnerable groups.•Home-based and combined interventions show no added safety risks. This guideline summarizes updated safety data (2017–2025) and provides expert recommendations on the use of low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in humans. tES encompasses several techniques including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (otDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS), and their combinations or variations. Across over 300,000 sessions involving healthy individuals, patients with neuropsychiatric conditions, and other clinical populations, no tES-related serious adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Moderate AEs are rare and limited to a small range of specific applications. Mild AEs are common and include transient symptoms such as localized sensations (e.g., tingling or burning), headaches, and fatigue. Similar mild AEs are also reported by individuals receiving placebo stimulation. The frequency, magnitude, and type of AEs are comparable across healthy, clinical, and vulnerable groups, including children, elderly, or pregnant women. Combined interventions (e.g., co-application with EEG, TMS, or neuroimaging) have not shown increased safety risks. Safety is well-established for both bipolar and multichannel tES when applied up to 4 mA and up to 60 min per day. Higher intensities and longer stimulation durations may also be safe. Nevertheless, the number of studies using intensities above 4 mA or stimulating longer than 60 min is low. Home-based use of treatments is growing rapidly, leveraging remote supervision to provide patients with greater access and enable repeated, sustained dosing paradigms. We recommend using screening and AE questionnaires in future controlled studies, in particular when planning to extend the stimulation parameters applied. We discuss recent regulatory and ethical issues.
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111436View
Published (Version of record)CC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Metrics

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy