Abstract
What is the full range of ways in which morphomes can figure in the organization of a morphological system? If we believe that arguments for the existence of morphomes are compelling, then this question demands attention. It is argued that morphomic organization can extend even to morphotactics. Earlier research (Round 2013, 2015) establishes that the realization of morphosyntactic feature-values in Kayardild requires a morphomic analysis if empirical generalizations are to be adequately expressed within a formal account. Here it is demonstrated that morphotactic constraints, which determine licit and illicit morphological strings in Kayardild, operate in terms of the same morphomic categories motivated by other aspects of the inflectional system. Consequences and priorities for future morphomic research are discussed.