Logo image
Impact of saturated fat absorption on serum low density lipoprotein-cholesterol response to the replacement of saturated with unsaturated fats in healthy males. The 'Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Saturated fat Cholesterol Intervention-2 (RISSCI-2)' non-randomised sequential dietary intervention study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Impact of saturated fat absorption on serum low density lipoprotein-cholesterol response to the replacement of saturated with unsaturated fats in healthy males. The 'Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Saturated fat Cholesterol Intervention-2 (RISSCI-2)' non-randomised sequential dietary intervention study

Barbara A Fielding, Athanasios Koutsos, Rona Antoni, Ezgi Ozen, Hasnaa Ayyad, M Denise Robertson, Jonathan Swann, Kim G Jackson, Julie A Lovegrove and Bruce A Griffin
Atherosclerosis, Vol.421, p.121884
10/2026
PMID: 42664559

Abstract

Risk markers Dietary fat replacement Interindividual variation LDL-Cholesterol Postprandial lipaemia Stable isotope labelling Cardiovascular Disease
Serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol varies in response to the isonergetic replacement of saturated (SFA) with unsaturated fats (UFA), as reported in our previous screening study, 'Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Saturated fat Cholesterol Intervention-1' (RISSCI-1). In the present study, we aimed to determine if differences in postprandial absorption and metabolic handling of SFA could explain variability in responsiveness of serum LDL-cholesterol to dietary SFA intake. Male participants classified according to their fasting LDL-cholesterol response to the replacement of SFA with UFA in our screening study (RISSCI-1) as higher (HR, n = 19) or lower responders (LR, n = 17), were placed on two, 4-week isoenergetic diets (higher-SFA/lower-UFA followed by lower-SFA/higher-UFA). After each diet, [U- C]palmitic acid was given in the first of two sequential meals to trace postprandial saturated fat absorption. Repeating the previous dietary regime in the same participants resulted in similar inter-individual variation in LDL-cholesterol response, with greater reductions in lipid ratios (total cholesterol:high density lipoprotein (HDL) and LDL-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol) and largest LDL-1-subfraction in the HR versus the LR group (p < 0.0001 for all). There was no difference in the absorption of SFA between groups but a significantly greater recovery of [U- C]palmitic acid-triacylglycerol in the postprandial period in LR relative to the HR group after SFA replacement with UFA was observed (p = 0.019). Dietary SFA absorption did not explain individual variation in serum LDL-cholesterol response to SFA replacement with UFA. Exploratory findings of a difference in postprandial [U- C]palmitic acid-triacylglycerol warrants further investigation.
pdf
Fielding et al 2026 Atherosclerosis clean_AAM518.89 kBDownloadView
Author's Accepted Manuscript Open Access CC BY V4.0
pdf
Fielding et al 2026 Supplementary_clean370.84 kBDownloadView
Author's Accepted Manuscript Supplementary Information Open Access CC BY V4.0
pdf
Fielding et al 2026 Highlights_clean52.90 kBDownloadView
Author's Accepted Manuscript Highlights Open Access CC BY V4.0
pptx
Graphical abstract Fielding et al clean copy472.30 kBDownloadView
Author's Accepted Manuscript Graphical Abstract Open Access CC BY V4.0
tiff
Figure 2 1000 dpi6.25 MBDownloadView
textimage Open Access CC BY V4.0

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy