Abstract
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are often misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures (ES), leading to inappropriate treatment and delayed psychological care. To address this challenge, we analysed electroencephalogram (EEG) data from 74 patients (46 PNES, 28 ES) using one-minute preictal and interictal recordings per subject. Nine entropy measures (Sample, Fuzzy, Permutation, Dispersion, Conditional, Phase, Spectral, Rényi, and Wavelet entropy) were evaluated individually to classify PNES from ES using k-nearest neighbours, Naïve Bayes, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, multilayer perceptron, and XGBoost within a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation framework. In addition, a dynamic state, defined as the entropy difference between interictal and preictal periods, was examined. Sample, Fuzzy, Conditional, and Dispersion entropy were higher in PNES than in ES during interictal recordings (not significant), but significantly lower in the preictal (p < 0.05) and dynamic states (p < 0.01). Spatial mapping and permutation-based importance analyses highlighted O1, O2, T5, F7, and Pz as key discriminative channels. Classification performance peaked in the dynamic state, with Fuzzy entropy and support vector machine achieving the best results (balanced accuracy = 72.4%, F1 score = 77.8%, sensitivity = 74.5%, specificity = 70.4%). These results demonstrate the potential of entropy features for differentiating PNES from ES.