Abstract
This article attempts to present a coherent theory that explains the inconsistent and highly political application of deprivation of citizenship in the UK. An analysis of 21st century cases shows that the primary motivation behind the government's approach in this area is to respond to and manipulate public opinion. Furthermore, deprivation of citizenship is not useful as a national security tool, as claimed, and instead only gives the appearance of the government taking strong decisive action in the 'war on terror'. Turning to public relations theory and particularly the work of Edward Bernays, this article shows how public relations themes have dominated deprivation of citizenship policy. This is a dangerous and inappropriate use of an extraordinary executive power and an excellent example of the 'engineering of consent'.