Abstract
Building on the upper echelon and signalling theories, we hypothesize that perceptions about the corporate ethical behaviour in the country of origin of a venture's founders may provide an important piece of information to the selection committees of impact-oriented accelerator programmes that serves as a signal for the trustworthiness and opportunistic behaviour of the founding team. In turn, this could have implications for the decision regarding admission into a programme. Using a sample of over 16,000 early-stage ventures from 131 countries that applied to 287 accelerator programmes, we find evidence consistent with this hypothesis. Our results show that better perceptions about the ethical behaviour of the founding team enhance the likelihood of admission into an impact-oriented accelerator programme. The role of perceived ethics appears to be stronger in the case of programmes that guarantee some kind of financing. Further analysis shows that the strength of both formal and informal institutions moderates the relationship between the ethical perceptions and the admission likelihood.