Logo image
Modelling anaerobic co-digestion with agricultural feedstock: model validation and cross-reactor verification
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Modelling anaerobic co-digestion with agricultural feedstock: model validation and cross-reactor verification

Rohit Murali, Benaissa Dekhici, Tao Chen, Dongda Zhang and Michael Short
Energy conversion and management. X, Vol.31, p.102135
07/2026

Abstract

ADM1 Anaerobic digestion Co-digestion Physical twin
[Display omitted] •Physical twin validation demonstrated robust biogas prediction (R2 = 0.85).•Cross-reactor validation confirmed model generalisability over 200 days.•Model accurately predicted dynamic responses to OLR stress tests.•Validated framework provides a reliable basis for full-scale digital twins. As the United Kingdom (UK) targets net-zero emissions by 2050, anaerobic digestion (AD) has become a cornerstone of renewable energy infrastructure. However, mathematical models, such as the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), often struggle with high-solids agricultural feedstocks because they rely on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), a metric that introduces significant experimental error. To overcome this, this study applies an established mass-based ADM1 framework tailored for the co-digestion of maize silage and cow manure sourced from a UK AD site. This study uses a parallel reactor framework, using two identical laboratory-scale reactors to physically replicate the dynamic conditions of the full-scale site. A Global Sensitivity Analysis was first conducted, identifying biomass decay and carbohydrate breakdown rates as the most influential factors affecting system stability and model accuracy. The model was calibrated using data from the first reactor and then tested against an independent second reactor subjected to significant organic loading stress. Results show high predictive capabilities, with the model achieving a R2 of 0.81 for biogas production during calibration. The model maintained high predictive accuracy during the validation test of the second physical twin, achieving an R2 of 0.85, proving that the framework is robust and not overfitted to a single dataset. While predicting rapid fluctuations in pH and alkalinity remains challenging, the mass-based approach effectively forecasts gas yields and captures the qualitative trends of process stability. This methodology provides a reliable foundation for robust process modelling, offering a scalable tool for the UK biogas sector to optimise AD.
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.102135View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

2 Record Views

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy