Abstract
The authors regret that we found a small error in Table 9. This is the published table, with the incorrect figures highlighted. Table 9[Figure presented] These are the correct numbers: Global, North America, Innovation → change from 48 to 49. Global, Innovation, Total → Change from 66 to 67. Global, North America, Transaction → change from 67 to 66. Global, Transaction, Total → Change from 136 to 135. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.