Abstract
Coronaviruses can infect a wide range of species causing significant disease and economic losses. They are</p><p class="ql-align-justify">capable of crossing the species barrier and infecting a new host, often resulting in a highly pathogenic disease.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">Since 2017, there have been 5 reported outbreaks of swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-</p><p class="ql-align-justify">CoV) in China causing a fatal porcine enteric disease. Phylogenetic analysis has shown coronavirus</p><p class="ql-align-justify">interspecies transmission events have ancestral origins in bats, in particular SADS-CoV has high sequence</p><p class="ql-align-justify">homology to bat-CoV Hong Kong University 2 (HKU2) which is epizootic to Chinese horseshoe bats.</p><p class="ql-align-justify"></p><p class="ql-align-justify">The major differences between HKU2 and SADS-CoV lie in the accessory proteins. Between HKU2 and</p><p class="ql-align-justify">SADS-CoV there is gain of a new ORF 7b. Between these viruses are four strains of SADS related (SADSr)-</p><p class="ql-align-justify">CoVs from bats with intermediate greater sequence homology to SADS- CoV. It is possible that the ORF 7b</p><p class="ql-align-justify">sequence contributes to SADS-CoVs ability to adapt to specific hosts and alter stress signalling responses.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">Accessory proteins have no homology in number or function between coronaviruses, these proteins are not</p><p class="ql-align-justify">required for replication but are expressed throughout infection and are fundamental in inhibiting anti-viral</p><p class="ql-align-justify">pathways. Despite this, the role of coronavirus accessory proteins in stress signalling is understudied and in</p><p class="ql-align-justify">enabling host switching is not known. Notably, viruses from diverse families have been found to modulate</p><p class="ql-align-justify">stress granule (SG) formation in infected cells by associating with important SG effector proteins. SGs are</p><p class="ql-align-justify">known to sequester viral mRNA preventing translation and participate in pathogen sensing, innate immunity,</p><p class="ql-align-justify">and translational control. Coronavirus accessory proteins are known to play a role in regulating stress</p><p class="ql-align-justify">signalling. Interestingly, differences in signalling pathways between species can impact the ability of a virus to</p><p class="ql-align-justify">regulate anti-viral responses.</p><p class="ql-align-justify"></p><p class="ql-align-justify">As there is huge potential for future transmission of novel coronaviruses from bats into new host species, it is</p><p class="ql-align-justify">important to understand the ability of SADS-CoV accessory proteins in regulating stress signalling pathways</p><p class="ql-align-justify">in bats and pigs. In this study the interactions between SADS-CoV and HKU2 (including SADSr-CoV</p><p class="ql-align-justify">intermediate viruses) accessory proteins and stress signalling, specifically characterising virus-induced</p><p class="ql-align-justify">modulations in SG abundance and how this may play a fundamental role in dictating the success of viral</p><p class="ql-align-justify">replication will be explored in bat and porcine cells. This may have wider applications to understanding the</p><p class="ql-align-justify">viral changes that are necessary to cross the species barrier in future.</p><p class="ql-align-justify"></p><p class="ql-align-justify">This work determines that in bat and porcine cells transfected with SADS-CoV and HKU2 accessory proteins</p><p class="ql-align-justify">the proteins localise in majority to the endoplasmic reticulum. Multiple bat and porcine cell lines can respond</p><p class="ql-align-justify">to different stressors mounting G3BP1-positive stress granules. Amongst bat and porcine cells similarities</p><p class="ql-align-justify">were observed in SADS-CoV 3a and HKU2 3 and SADS-CoV 7a and HKU2 7 stress granules regardless of</p><p class="ql-align-justify">the type of stress. Overall, in bat cells the stress response was more inhibited compared to porcine cells that</p><p class="ql-align-justify">mounted a stress response with more stress granules and larger stress granules. Notable differences between</p><p class="ql-align-justify">the viruses lie with SADS-CoV 7b and may hold answers to increased immune evasion, interferon antagonism,</p><p class="ql-align-justify">inflammation induction and apoptosis modulation between SADS-CoV and closely related bat-CoV HKU2.</p>