Abstract
This thesis, entitled " Algorithmic control in hospitality workplaces: the impact on
workplace experience and employee affective well-being", aims to provide a comprehensive
understanding of forms, mechanisms and reactions to algorithmic management, specifically to
algorithmic control in the hospitality sector. The four interrelated studies evaluate existing
knowledge, investigate user perspectives, develop measurement instruments and construct and
validate a model of resistance to algorithmic management and its individual and organisational
outcomes in hospitality workplaces.
Study One formulates the concept of algorithmic normative control by drawing on the
established management literature on labour process and the emerging discourse on algorithmic
management and presents the ‘7Ps’ of algorithmic normative control within a multi-level
process framework that shows how algorithms gradually deconstruct human agency,
reconfigure behaviours, and internalise control through persuasion, pressure, and perception
structuration.
By applying Sociomateriality Theory, Study Two examines the compensatory roles of
managers and algorithmic systems through "enabling control" mechanisms in humanising
algorithmic management. This study contributes to the sociomaterial discourse on algorithmic
management by proposing a theoretical framework for humanised systems in hospitality,
addressing power asymmetries through selective visibility of controls, and distributed agency.
Study Three employs a mixed-methods approach to conceptualise and test the three
dimensional Resistance to Algorithmic Management (RAM) scale and to investigate its
relationship with employee affective well-being in hospitality workplaces. Following a four
stage development process, a 12-item BIRAM scale is developed, which includes affective,
cognitive, and behavioural resistance dimensions.
Study Four engages in a mixed-methods approach to test how enhancements and
restraints of algorithmic management influence resistance, affective well-being, and turnover
intentions of hospitality employees. Testing the model in varying algorithmic control
mechanism, manager’s involvement, and algorithmic opacity conditions, this study finds that
while enhancements positively contribute to affective well-being of employees, they do not
mitigate resistance, which is primarily driven by restraints. Resistance negatively impacts
affective well-being, which subsequently drives turnover intention. Findings further reveal a non-linear relationship between enhancements and restraints, identifying an ‘optimal cost’
point where the perception of enhancements by the employees is maximised.
In sum, this thesis advances knowledge on algorithmic management in the context of
hospitality, by examining forms of control, mechanisms of control, and the multifaceted
impacts on hospitality employees.