Abstract
This paper compares three different fitness diversity adaptations in Multimeme Algorithms (MmAs). These diversity indexes have been integrated within a MmA present in literature, namely Fast Adaptive Memetic Algorithm. Numerical results show that it is not possible to establish a superiority of one of these adaptive schemes over the others and choice of a proper adaptation must be made by considering features of the problem under study. More specifically, one of these adaptations outperforms the others in the presence of plateaus or limited range of variability in fitness values, another adaptation is more proper for landscapes having distant and strong basins of attraction, the third one, in spite of its mediocre average performance can occasionally lead to excellent results.