Surrey researchers Sign in
Back
Philosophy, Neuroscience and Law: The Conceptual and Empirical, Rule-Following, Interpretation and Knowledge
Book chapter   Peer reviewed

Philosophy, Neuroscience and Law: The Conceptual and Empirical, Rule-Following, Interpretation and Knowledge

Dennis Patterson and Michael S. Pardo
Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following, (111), pp.177-188
Law and Philosophy Library book series, Springer, Cham
08/11/2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_13

Abstract

Neuroscience Rule-following Conceptual Empirical Analytic Philosophy
The intersection between law and neuroscience is one of the most-discussed subfields in legal scholarship. In this article, we consider fundamental issues in the field. These include: the distinction between the conceptual and the empirical, rule-following, and the nature of knowledge. We maintain that the conceptual issues are fundamental to all aspects of this enterprise.
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09375-8_13View
Published (Version of record)

Metrics

36 Record Views

Details

Usage Policy

Usage details for all content viewed and downloaded in this site are shared with IRUS-UK (Institutional Repository Usage Statistics UK). Cookies are used to remember your decision. Click Accept to accept usage details sharing and the cookies.

Learn more